The Flaw is the Engine:

Storytelling, Therapy, and the Gap That Drives Us

Why do we care about characters? What hooks us into them? It’s very often not their brilliance, competence, or success: it’s most often their struggles. Particularly the ones that are brought about by their flaws.

You see, a really compelling character will often make choices informed by their flaws, and it’s these choices that create the very problems they must face.

So the gap between what they think they ‘want’ and what they might actually ‘need’ creates tension. And it’s that gap (almost always unconscious to them) that becomes their engine of transformation.

But this isn’t just in screenwriting, you see this all the time in psychotherapy.

The Flaw is the Filter

A flaw isn’t just a weak spot in a character’s armour. It’s often a defence - and it’s the lens through which they interpret reality.

  • A narcissistic character doesn’t simply crave attention; they interpret every interaction as a potential threat to their self-worth.

  • An avoidant character doesn’t just fear intimacy; they see closeness as danger.

The flaw shapes perception, and perception drives choices. And those choices (often well-meaning, often desperate) lead directly to the conflict the character will later have to resolve.

What Looks Like an Obstacle... Is Actually a Mirror

We tend to think the plot ‘happens to’ the character. But in truly compelling stories, the plot is more like a mirror. It reflects the protagonist’s flaw back at them again and again, from every possible angle.

What looks like fate is often a response. The world pushes at where the character is weak - not to punish them, but to facilitate growth (or kill them in the process).

This is why a character who is ‘good at everything' is almost always boring. If they just breeze through the story without being tested in their weakness, there’s no arc. No tension. No change. No meaning.

The Gap Between Want and Need

So the real core of character transformation is the conflict between what the character wants, and what they need.

  • What they want is clear, external, conscious: success, love, revenge, safety.

  • What they need is internal, hidden, often painful: healing, humility, truth, responsibility.

They chase what they want until the pursuit stops working, or until the thing they thought would save them is revealed to be another dead end.

And then… they have a choice: to face the need, or double down on the want.

In psychotherapy, this is a familiar pattern.

A person comes in saying, “I just want someone to love me.” But what they need is to explore why they keep choosing people who can’t. Or why, deep down, they don’t believe they deserve love at all.

Another might say, “I want to feel better, I want the pain to go away.” But the need is to finally feel the grief they’ve been suppressing for years, and to stop running from the truth of their experience.

The want is the survival strategy. The need is the path to healing.

Testing the Flaw

Good storytelling doesn’t protect the protagonist. It tests them. It presses on the flaw. The love interest leaves. The promotion backfires. The lie is exposed.

These aren't random obstacles. They’re invitations.

The story isn’t punishing the character. It’s inviting them to transform. And unless their flaw is exposed, unless the thing they don’t want to face is brought right to the surface, nothing will change.

From the Page to the Therapy Room: Kendall Roy (Succession)

Kendall Roy, the heir apparent in Succession, is a character driven by a desperate hunger to prove himself. He wants to become CEO, to win his father’s approval, to finally feel like he matters. On the surface, he’s chasing power, but beneath that lies a deeper psychological need: to be loved, to be safe, and to be seen without having to perform.

His flaw: a deep insecurity masked by bravado, drives him into boardrooms, betrayals, and breakdowns. Every decision he makes in pursuit of success only widens the chasm between who he is, and who he thinks he needs to be.

His addiction is more than a plot device, it’s a mirror of his emotional life. Drugs and alcohol offer momentary relief from the unbearable emptiness of never having been enough for his father. Each relapse is less a failure of will and more a return to a familiar self: wounded, numb, and ashamed. Kendall’s efforts at recovery tend to coincide with a new project, a new role to inhabit, a new version of himself to believe in. But the pain always catches up because he never allows himself to truly grieve what he never received.

Ultimately, Kendall is a tragic figure not because he wants too much, but because he can’t stop wanting the wrong thing. His arc is a psychological parable: when we define ourselves by what we lack, we chase goals that only deepen the wound. His flaw isn't that he’s weak, it’s that he keeps trying to fix his pain with the very tools that caused it.

And like many clients in therapy, the breakthrough would come not from finally winning, but from putting down the mask and facing the grief. Only then could he stop being Logan’s shadow, and start truly being himself.

But hey, where would be the fun in that for the viewer?

Final Thought: Story as Soul Work

A lot of good stories are a kind of therapeutic journey. A character is thrown into chaos. They reach for what they want. And through the conflict, they’re forced to confront what they truly need.

Not all stories end with resolution. Some characters die clinging to the want. Others awaken. But the beauty (and entertainment) is in the struggle.

And so it is with ourselves. We all live with our flaws, filters, and survival strategies. We all think we want one thing, until the stories of our lives ask us:

“But what is it that you really need?”.

‘CHEKHOV’S HANDJOB’

or

Why The White Lotus Season 3 Was A Bit Disappointing

Warning: To say that this article contains spoilers would be an understatement.

Setting the Bar in Sicily

Let me start by saying that I absolutely loved The White Lotus Season 2. It was the best TV I’d watched in years. So much so that I dedicated a whole session of the “6-Month Episodic TV” course to breaking down its character arcs: how they felt rich, complete, and thematically cohesive.

Each storyline explored sexual politics and power dynamics with such clarity and suspense, intersecting beautifully with the central theme to offer a rich and satisfying dramatic interrogation.

It had me hooked up until the very last moment, where the body in the water (the now classic Lotusian cold open device designed to have the audience asking “who’s body is that?” and “how did we get here?” so that you’ll stick around to the finale to find out) could really have been anyone out of the glittering array of characters.

So as you can imagine, I was really excited about TWL3, and sat down to it having done my best to avoid anything on the internet that might give away the identity of the corpse floating in the Thai hotel’s jungle waterways.

Sawadee Khắp Thailand

On paper, The White Lotus 3 had everything. A luscious new location. A phenomenal cast of newcomers: Rick and his warm-hearted girlfriend Chelsea; the wealthy, sexually-charged Ratliff brothers Saxon and Lochlan; the wellness-return of Belinda (hello again), and returning villain Greg, now posing as “Gary,” Tanya’ Mcquoid’s weaselly widower. 

Shots are fired, a body hangs in the water, let’s go!

And then suddenly, just like that, out of nowhere - nothing really happened.

Chekhov’s Gun

Anton Chekhov famously said something like: “If a gun is on the mantelpiece in the first act, it must go off in the third.” It’s a storytelling rule about payoff: don’t introduce something unless it serves a purpose later. And I’d add the reverse: if something is going to explode in Act 3, you have to set it up early. This is how we avoid the dreaded deus ex machina ending: surprises that feel unearned, because the groundwork wasn't laid.

The White Lotus 3 flirted with setup after setup, metaphorical mantelpieces groaning with Chekhovian guns, and then... just sort of wandered off to get a massage.

Let’s look at a few examples.

1. The Ratliff Brothers: Incest with No Consequences

From episode one, Lachlan’s hungry glances at his brother Saxon’s body telegraph the unspoken taboo at the heart of their dynamic. It all comes to a head (literally) when he gives his brother a handjob during a threesome. Gross? Yes. Dramatic? Possibly. But after a brief “that was weird” chat, it’s... never mentioned again.

No fallout. No reckoning. No spiral of shame or violence. Just a plot beat that seemed to disappear into the spa mist.

2. The Poison Seeds That Didn’t Kill

In episode one, we learn about the lethal pong pong seeds therefore, Chekhov demands someone eat them later. Sure enough, Lachlan accidentally eats them... and then doesn’t die. Not even a hospitalisation. Ok, he meets God but doesn’t have much to say about that either. I actually wish he had died because then I would have felt something.

3. Frank’s Monologue That Went Nowhere

Frank delivers a powerful, raw confession about his past sex addiction, including experiences dressing as an Asian woman and engaging in transactional sex with tourists. It’s a moment brimming with psychological complexity. Surely this is laying the groundwork for something later: shame, temptation, collapse, redemption? Nope. But it could have been so interesting(!).

4. Greg’s Sex Worker Girlfriend: A Non-Twist

We spend multiple episodes with Greg’s girlfriend, a mysterious sex worker who seems to be manipulating him... or maybe being manipulated... or maybe just likes having sex on yachts. But ultimately? She has sex. And then continues having sex.

5. Greg, Belinda and Zion

Belinda and Zion ask Greg for $5m, and he gives it to them.

6. Rick’s Father Drama

Even Rick and Chelsea’s deaths in the shootout at the end feels flat and contrived. The revelation that the man who killed Rick’s father is his father is all a bit of a nothing-burger. No-one asked, but ok, now we know.

So What Went Wrong?

It’s not that The White Lotus 3 didn’t try to set up interesting dynamics: it’s that it didn’t pay them off. You can’t tease incest, poisoning, sex addiction, and patricide and then resolve none of it with any dramatic weight.

Part of the show’s brilliance has always been its ability to weave character studies with genre tension, and satire with suspense. But this time, it felt like creator Mike White was more interested in the vibe than the story. The result is a season that looks great, sounds interesting, but feels dramatically inert. If you have so many compelling, intricately-crafted guns, it’s such a shame when they don’t go off.

Our next Introduction to Screenwriting course starts: May 12th, 2025! Monday nights - 7-10 pm UK on Zoom. The course costs: £440

email: contact@lifeinthestory.co.uk

Carys Thomas Signed By Independent Talent Group

12.06.2024

We are delighted to announce that our alumna Carys Thomas has been signed by Francesca Devas at Independent Talent Group. Carys is a fabulously talented, prolific and hard-working writer and we wish her all the best with all her projects.

Life In The Stories #1

10.01.2024

PHILIP BARANTINI

In this revealing discussion, seasoned actor, producer and award-winning BOILING POINT-director Philip Barantini talks about his career, addictions, and the turning points in his life that have lead to his success.

Holly Hunter wins Yarns 2023!

4.12.2023

Our very talented former student Holly Hunter has won Yarns 2023 with her comedy short BANANA BOAT.

It’s a whimsical comedy that sees two mothers and their sons face off over tickets for the final banana boat ride of the summer. It’s very funny, and it’s very good.

Carys & Thor.

Former students Carys & Thor have made two short films amongst other projects since the course. They are a super-talented writing and directing partnership and you can watch their work below.

Reducing Reoffending & The Hero’s Journey at HMP Thameside.

‘The Hero’s Journey’ at HMP Thameside 

Over the summer, we held 6 workshops with a group of inmates exploring their personal mythology - the stories of their lives and how they relate to them - via Joseph Campbell’s concept of ‘The Hero’s Journey’. ‘The Hero’s Journey’ is made up of several universal stages that make up the structure of all stories, from ancient myths and scriptures, to modern films and TV episodes, and ultimately the stories that we are living in our own lives. 

In weekly group discussions inspired by the stages of the journey e.g. ‘The Ordinary World’, ‘Meeting The Mentor’, ‘The Ordeal’ and ‘Resurrection’, the participants were encouraged to look at their lives from a mythological perspective, and to recognise any patterns and themes that they might share with each other. 

Along the way, discussions were supported and inspired by meditations and visualisations, e.g. asking the members to imagine and then draw items given to them by their mentors to help them with that particular stage of the journey. The process was highly bonding for the group, with honesty and vulnerability on show once trust had been established, and with personal insights often revealing themselves to the increasingly supportive group. As we reached the end of the journey, it became clear that many members had really benefitted from the process, learning not just about themselves and their own qualities but being able to recognise those in others by connecting to the group. In prison it can be difficult for inmates to access or seek therapeutic resources, especially due to the stigma attached to the perception of seeking therapy, so it seems ‘The Hero’s Journey’-style workshops can be an effective way for participants to find themselves engaging in a process without feeling self-conscious. 

The mythological element also allows for them to talk about difficult aspects of their lives from a safely detached distance when necessary, and share with an understanding group. As became apparent during our sessions, when themes in their collective backstories emerged e.g. abuse and addiction, it allowed them the opportunity to connect with each other and see themselves and their behaviour as possible adaptations to challenging circumstances rather than to view themselves as ‘bad’ or ‘broken’, and therefore fully capable of rehabilitation. Overall, ‘The Hero’s Journey’ seemed like a great success with a powerful potential to be applied to more groups at Thameside in the coming year. 

Instagram